Identity Providers
You keep the identity provider you already run. Apiway does not ask you to migrate directories, re-issue identities, or adopt a second source of truth for who your people are.
Bring your own
Section titled “Bring your own”Apiway is identity-provider agnostic. Any provider that speaks OIDC and OAuth 2.0 federates, which in practice means the one you already use:
| Provider | Federates |
|---|---|
| Google Workspace | Yes — standard OIDC |
| Microsoft Entra ID | Yes — standard OIDC |
| Okta | Yes — standard OIDC |
| Auth0 | Yes — standard OIDC |
| Keycloak | Yes — standard OIDC |
| Any other OIDC provider | Yes |
The list is illustrative rather than exhaustive. The requirement is the standard, not the vendor — if it publishes an OIDC discovery document and issues tokens, it works.
Or use the one that comes with it
Section titled “Or use the one that comes with it”Apiway includes an authorisation server. If you have no provider you want to federate — or you are issuing credentials to external consumers and partners rather than to employees — the platform issues and manages them itself: OAuth 2.0 client credentials for machine-to-machine consumers, authorisation code with PKCE for user-facing applications.
Most organisations end up using both: their own provider for employees, and the platform’s authorisation server for the consumers of their APIs, who do not exist in the corporate directory and should not.
What This Covers
Section titled “What This Covers”Federation applies to the APIs you publish and the people and systems that call them — your workforce reaching your own APIs, your customers’ applications, your partners, and AI agents acting for any of them.
Administering your Apiway tenant through the management console is a separate surface with its own sign-in, and it does not currently federate an arbitrary provider. If that matters to your rollout, raise it — it is a known limitation rather than a design position.
Why agnostic matters beyond convenience
Section titled “Why agnostic matters beyond convenience”An identity layer you cannot replace is a dependency, not an asset. Because Apiway federates rather than owns, the identity provider underneath stays replaceable — and so does Apiway. A control layer that locked you to one identity vendor would be reproducing the problem it exists to solve.
What this does not change
Section titled “What this does not change”Whichever provider you federate, enforcement is unchanged: authorisation is applied per operation at the gateway, and the caller’s current entitlements are resolved on every request rather than trusted from the credential. Federation establishes who someone is; what they may do is decided by Apiway when the request arrives. See Security.
See also: Authentication · Scopes · Identity Guard · Deployment Models